Social
Norms Part 2. We live in a world where everyone yearns to live a life different
than what they have. We see the wise men advising us to be satisfied in what we
have at hand. We see the leaders in the arts and sciences, the pioneers of
their respective field telling us to never sit around doing nothing, to grab
any and every opportunity that life throws at us, to leap forward not caring of
the consequences. We live in a world of hypocrisy, where an adventurous
attitude is unwise, and a steady life is too boring.
Once we
have passed the phase of elementary education, giving an insight in all
possible fields of work (hopefully), we have to choose our vocation, and set
our course for a steady life in the future, so that we are self sufficient in
life. We work, for the initial period being full of energy and dedication,
being new at it. We find a partner, and another phase of this life begins, one
whose end is marked by what is known popularly as a mid-life crisis. We pass
through it and reach a stage of old age. We now must have time to appreciate
"the little things in life" (apparently). Then we die. The End…
This is
the story of the average adult phase of human life. Something so important that
I mentioned it here, given the fact that everyone knows it. It is the actual
time that an individual can "contribute" to the society around. Why
do we fear to do what is logical? It is not logical at all for this life to be
normal.
Getting
to the point now, the unwanted, biggest obstacle amongst the prevalent social
norms around, the one that is the most hindrance, is the importance of a
median. Why must we have an average in everything?
It is
time now that the society grows up. It is time now that it understands the
importance of thinking. The very existence of an average arises from the
laziness of making informed decisions. If its average, its okay. Okay won't
change anything. Okay isn't good enough for survival. Ants don’t stop
collecting food once they have enough ration for every member of the colonies.
They go on. And on. Until they can. The reason they can do this is that they
are not bound by any invisible contract that a particular average is mandatory.
If any member gathers less than usual, or more than usual, they know that for
both the cases, the best effort was given. We have forgotten amidst these norms
of ours, that we are like any organism on this earth, if not the universe; we
must survive. Not just on an individual level but as a species. It is time we
change the game. It is time we change our goal on the level of our race. We
live to better the lives of everyone around us. This is the humanitarian aim.
We must now live to excel. On an individual level. We must strive to live in a
world where art is created for the purpose of kindling our imagination, dams
are designed and built ingeniously to generate more available power, gadgets
are made for making more free time available to be productive. When a new
stride is taken in any field, it should not be required to be questioned on an
ethical or moral point of view. Because ethics/morality are the second biggest
hindrance amongst social norms. It is time we take in the fact that there is no
divine rulebook or guideline that we must live by. That is something that other
creatures need. As humans we have an advanced brain to help us do that. We all
can think. So why should be knowledge a sin? It made sense when we were unaware
of our thinking capabilities. Not now. We must understand the role morals play
in our lives, reason why they exist, imbibe that in our thinking, and then
abandon them. Because they weren't made to fit in every situation that we face.
Bill
Gates, Stephen Hawkings and even Steve Wozniak, amongst others have raised
concerns over development of artificial intelligence. They say that at one
stage, machines will reach a stage where they are smarter than us. Computers
are becoming smarter by the day. Why not us? Why be lazy and stop innovation?
Why not take steps to reform our current norms? Finland has recently announced
the decisions to scrap subjects in schools in preference to individual topics
being taught and evaluated upon, breaking barriers for interdisciplinary
studies. We must understand from this that no radical steps be necessarily
taken to evolve; just thoughtful alterations are good enough in the beginning.
And now
we arrive at another fundamental error prevalent in our system. In order to
solve a problem, we must trace it back to its roots. So in order to tackle the
problems we face in adulthood, we must look towards our childhood. Our parents
are inarguably the biggest influence of our childhood. They teach us every
aspect of living, and introduce us to these norms. They are bestowed upon an
unquestionable authority: they know the best for their child. This norm, of
blindly accepting this belief as a fact, needs to be questioned. I will take it
up in the next post soon. So long, and I'll be back.
No comments:
Post a Comment